Leading article: Explanations are required over hacking

Tuesday 16 August 2011 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

There can be no excuses now. The latest revelations in the phone-hacking scandal have finally torpedoed News International's "rogue reporter" defence.

The allegations could not be more serious. Andy Coulson has said throughout he knew nothing of hacking while editor of the News of the World. But the letter from former royal correspondent Clive Goodman, published yesterday, claims hacking was "widely discussed" and that Mr Coulson said he could keep his job if he avoided implicating the paper at his trial. Either Mr Goodman is lying. Or Mr Coulson is.

The challenge to the Murdochs is no less devastating. Both father and son have cited Harbottle & Lewis in their "rogue reporter" claims. But the lawyers now say their inquiry was limited, and the use of its conclusions by the Murdochs "inaccurate and misleading".

The committee has already requested written clarification of parts of James Murdoch's testimony. Letters are not enough this time. No excuses. No delays. Rupert Murdoch, James Murdoch and Andy Coulson must be summoned back to the House of Commons to explain themselves.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in