Leading article: Early signs of realism on tuition fees
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.With preliminary figures indicating that university applications are down by a mere 9 per cent since the trebling of tuition fees, lurid predictions of an entire generation consigned to the educational scrapheap are starting to appear mercifully exaggerated.
So far, the squeeze on applicant numbers is far from transformational. Last year, as a glut of would-be students tried to get in ahead of the fee increases, some 160,000 applicants were turned away. Given that the number of places is broadly static this year, it would take considerably more than a 9 per cent drop to take the number of applications down below the number of available places.
More encouraging still, although the drop in applications from within the UK is a slightly higher 12 per cent, anecdotal evidence suggests fears that intakes of disadvantaged students would suffer worst from fees hiked to £9,000 per year are not borne out. That being the case, it is arguably no bad thing if prospective students are conducting more careful cost-benefit analyses before signing up for a degree.
Taken at face value, therefore, the data looks rather less bleak than doom-mongers predicted at the height of the dispute over fees. Look closer, however, and there are details that must at least give pause for thought. Most striking is the fact that the number of women applying for university places is falling so much faster than the number of men. And it can be no coincidence that some of the subject areas seeing the biggest drops are those allied to traditionally female-dominated areas of the public sector, such as education and nursing. With women already facing a disproportionate hit from both welfare reductions and public-sector job cuts, further evidence of a gender bias in the fallout from government spending cuts cannot be ignored.
There is no immediate cause for panic. There are still considerably more female applicants than male, even with the sharper rate of decline. And with the main deadline for university applications not until January, it is not yet time for firm conclusions. But while it may be too soon for alarm at the impact of higher fees, it is also too soon for complacency.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments