Leading Article: 'Drop-off zones' are not the answer

Sunday 26 August 2007 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

No one can blame ministers for wanting not only to do something, but to be seen to be doing something, in response to a crime such as the shooting of 11-year-old Rhys Jones. Yet it is hard to believe that the Home Secretary's plans for "drop-off zones" where people can hand in guns or offer tip-offs anonymously will do much to take guns off the streets.

Two phenomena have been referred to in recent breast-beating about firearms. The first is that guns are being hired out by the hour for as little as £50; this is not a great deal of money. The second is that partners, parents, even children are being given guns to hide, to protect the real owner from prosecution. If someone is prepared through loyalty or fear to hide someone else's weapon, he or she is likely to be very scared of "misplacing" it.

Anonymous hotlines for giving information about crime exist already. But the local version of omerta, sometimes described euphemistically as community solidarity, continually frustrates the police, especially where gun crime is concerned. It appears to have done so in this case.

All that said, however, it is important not to get gun crime out of proportion. Despite last week's killing in Croxteth, the incidence of crime involving firearms remains low in Britain; our strict laws do still hold the line. The Justice Secretary, Jack Straw, was also right to point out that the number of gun-related incidents has begun to fall – although he failed to clarify that the fall is nothing like as steep as the rise since the late 1990s. Knife crime remains many times more lethal.

We do not believe gun crime is out of control – or anything like it. It is also concentrated in relatively few places. The Home Office said yesterday that almost half of such crime takes place in only three cities: Liverpool, Manchester and London. Focusing counter-measures here should yield some success. Ministers and police describe Operation Trident as a success. More efforts should also be made to trace the origin of illegal guns.

Above all, though, rather than establishing new channels for anonymous tips, more notice should be taken of the reports that already come in from local people. It was in response to a rash of complaints about increased crime that a mobile police station was planned for the very car park where Rhys Jones was shot. It was then cancelled for lack of funds. Local residents have a better appreciation than anyone of what is happening around them. Lawlessness, gangs and vigilantism fill a vacuum that official indifference has left.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in