Leading article: Don't try to buck the housing market

Wednesday 27 August 2008 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Anyone who has lived through previous ups and downs in the housing market will find nothing surprising about the pain that housebuilders such as Taylor Wimpey are feeling at the moment. Until this year, it was an unsustainable bubble. Construction firms were always going to be in the blast zone when it inevitably burst.

But to historians, there will also be nothing surprising about the fact that these companies are now lobbying for state help to deal with the fallout. The directors of these construction companies know ministers are as nervous as they are about declining house prices. Such special pleading should, though, be ignored. These housebuilders are private companies that speculated and over-expanded recklessly in the boom. If they are rescued from the consequences of their decisions now, they will have no incentive to behave more wisely in future.

Yet that is not to say ministers should be entirely inactive. There are judicious measures the Government could be taking to alleviate some of the most socially damaging effects of the turmoil in the housing market. This does not mean luring first-time buyers into a falling market by suspending stamp duty, as some have suggested, and it does not mean subsidising housebuilders. The focus should be on helping people avoid the nightmare of repossession and preventing irrational panic.

As the Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman, Vince Cable, pointed out yesterday, the Government could establish a scheme to allow those unable to make their mortgage repayments to sell their homes to social landlords and remain as rent-paying tenants. Local authorities and housing associations could be given permission to buy unsold private properties to alleviate Britain's chronic shortage of social housing.

None of this should be done without great care. There is a fine line between state action to protect the vulnerable and bailing out the undeserving and improvident. If the Government is to have any chance of success it must be quite certain of what its purpose is. The idea that ministers can bring back the days of rising prices in short order is a dangerous fantasy. The market was grossly overvalued. An entirely natural correction is taking place. The job of the Government is to minimise the social harm of the downturn, not engage in reckless attempts to "rescue" the market.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in