Leading article: Blurred vision on drink law

Saturday 27 August 2005 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Her central argument is this: the culture among young people of drinking to get drunk has deep and complex causes - and flexible licensing hours are unlikely to have any effect on it. The evidence supports her. In Scotland, another nation with an alcoholic reputation, extended drinking hours do not seem to have made problem drinking worse.

Relaxing the First World War curfew on alcohol in public places after 11pm in England and Wales - misleadingly described as "24-hour drinking" - would have two clear benefits. One, it would allow responsible adults more choice over when and where to drink. Two, it would make it easier for the police to manage the fight'n'puke rush hour that hits so many city, town and village centres at 11pm. That may not solve the problem of why so many young people are so eager to seek temporary and repeated oblivion, but that may be largely beyond the reach of liberal democratic governments. There is little that the Government can or should do, apart from putting more pressure on the drinks industry to move away from a business model based on vertical drinking barns in which consumption is boosted by happy-hour promotions.

The scare campaign by sections of the press that has been taken up late in the day by David Davis, the shadow Home Secretary, offers no constructive measures for tackling the underlying problem - it seeks only to obstruct sensible, liberal and long-overdue reform.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in