Leading article: Black marks all round

Friday 29 October 2010 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The disgraceful episode that was the BP oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico has become even more so with the news that officials from both Halliburton and BP had been told beforehand that the cement to be used to seal the bottom of the well – and thus prevent such an explosion from occurring – was unstable.

But they went ahead anyway. On 20 April, the Macondo well blew up, killing 11 rig workers and creating the biggest oil spill in US history, inflicting billions of dollars' worth of economic and environmental damage. It is now clearer than ever that cutting of corners by companies in pursuit of profit, and grossly inadequate supervision by government regulators, were mainly to blame. Naturally, Halliburton, which manufactured the cement, is disputing the new findings released by the presidential commission set up to investigate the disaster. It says that early tests on the cement mixture suggesting that there were problems were "preliminary", and that, in any case, it had informed BP. But the findings contradict statements from Halliburton officials at earlier probes of the Deepwater Horizon disaster that the cement was perfectly stable – and that the main fault lay with BP for using too few centralisers – elements that ensure the drilling pipe is properly centred in the well.

BP, equally naturally, blames Halliburton, and the argument will continue. Suffice it to note that Halliburton, which was led between 1995 and 2000 by the former US vice-president Dick Cheney, has been involved in several controversies, including the alleged overcharging of the US military for work in Iraq and bribes paid by its former subsidiary KBR to top officials in Nigeria. If it is deemed to be significantly liable for the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, the financial consequences could be extremely serious – as evinced by the 16 per cent plunge in the company's share price when word first came of the commission's report.

But responsibility also lies with the US government. It is all very well to conduct rigorous inquires after the event. The truth is that the agency of the Interior Department supposedly policing oil well safety in the Gulf was so understaffed that the companies in effect wrote their own rules. This was a tragedy that should never have happened.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in