Leading article: Back from the edge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A group of retired military leaders, including the former Chief of Defence Staff, Lord Guthrie, have complained that the good name of the British armed forces has been "hijacked" by extremists. They seem to have the BNP in their sights, but do not name it.
This is needless timidity. If they mean the BNP, they should say so. However justified their grievance, though – that revered national symbols, such as Sir Winston Churchill and the Spitfire, are being harnessed to a reprehensible political campaign – banning certain uses of these images may not be the best way to proceed.
No one has a monopoly on national symbols. If the military had been less reluctant to vaunt its heritage as an asset for the nation as a whole, such symbols might not have been consigned to the margins. The "smart" solution now would be to rescue them from the far right by reclaiming them for the mainstream – as was done successfully with the St George's Cross.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments