Leading article: Attempts to open up the security services are still worth making
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Yvette Cooper is far from the first to call for a brighter parliamentary light to be shone on the hidden world of Britain's secret services. Alas, nor is she likely to be the last.
Writing for The Independent today, the shadow Home Secretary proposes that the Intelligence and Security Committee be beefed up and given greater powers of review. Ms Cooper makes a powerful case, citing extraordinary rendition and the "dodgy dossier" on Iraq. And she is right that closer scrutiny does not necessarily undermine the state's power to act effectively and in secret.
The problem is that calls for greater oversight tend to be squashed by the combined weight of the security establishment, the Home Secretary, and unanswerable claims of national security. Ms Cooper is not wrong; but it is difficult to see how she might succeed where so many others have failed.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments