Leading article: An unedifying blame game

Sunday 14 August 2011 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

As ministers and police chiefs try to paper over their differences over the handling of the riots, motes and beams come to mind. Each side has blamed the other for slowness to react, while insisting that its initiative was crucial to restoring order. Both exaggerate the fault and the credit.

It is disingenuous for the police to insist that they went on to the offensive all of their own accord, while chiding ministers with their absence. The original misjudgements are theirs; when a man was shot dead during a police operation in a sensitive part of the capital, they failed to anticipate the likely aftermath. When riots erupted, they seemed ill-prepared. Ministers, and the mayor of London, for their part were slow to appreciate the gravity of what was happening, not least because so many were on holiday at the same time. Police ranks may have been depleted for the same reason. Once back, ministers went overboard to show they were in charge.

A blame-game between politicians and police over what went wrong is as unedifying as it is futile. Each side needs to examine why its initial response left so much to be desired and work out how to avoid a repetition.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in