Leading article: A time to keep silence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Yesterday's ceremonies at the Cenotaph for Armistice Day – and the two minutes' silence, at the 11th hour on the 11th day of the 11th month – were dignified and moving, as they always are. Yet it is hard to understand why there should be two separate national acts of commemoration, one on Remembrance Sunday, and the other on Armistice Day itself. Indeed, since the addition of Veterans' Day in June three years ago, there is now a third.
The engagement of our armed forces overseas in recent years has made such acts of commemoration relevant to a new generation. Rather than multiplying the ceremonies, though, should we not combine them – and make Armistice Day itself a public holiday, as it is in France and the US. Not only would this give the day the recognition it deserves, it would also punctuate the long gap between the August bank holiday and Christmas and solve our dearth of public holidays. Who could possibly argue against it?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments