Leading article: A tale of two types of city

Sunday 17 January 2010 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

All cities are suffering in the present recession. But some are suffering more than others. A new report by the Centre for Cities think tank points to a widening economic gap between different urban conurbations around the country.

Population centres including Hull, Barnsley, Stoke-on-Trent, Burnley, Newport and Doncaster have seen a drastic jump in unemployment and a deep decline in business activity. Yet other places, among them, Brighton, Milton Keynes, Reading, Cambridge and Edinburgh have weathered the downturn significantly better and seems well placed to benefit from an economic recovery.

What this research emphasises is a trend of uneven economic development in Britain that was discernible long before this savage recession struck. Those cities hit hardest were already suffering before the downturn took hold. They had shed private sector jobs through the years of strong growth, relying disproportionately on the public sector for employment. And they have long registered a low rate of business start-ups.

The report makes it clear what the conditions are for a vibrant city economy: decent public transport links, a strong private sector business base and a well-educated workforce. It is the responsibility of any government which takes inequality, poverty and equality of opportunity seriously to learn these lessons.

Priorities are sustained investment in education and funding to modernise public transport links. And greater incentives need to be put in place for businesses to invest and establish themselves outside the already overdeveloped and prosperous South East.

The Government is behaving responsibly by providing training and work placements for the hundreds of thousands of young people who are presently unable to get into the labour market. Ministers are also sensible to delay cuts to public spending before the economy (in particular depressed northern cities) can absorb the necessary pain.

But what is needed beyond these crisis measures is a serious strategy to correct Britain's uneven pattern of regional economic development. Without such a strategy there is no end in sight for this painful tale of two types of British city.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in