Leading article: A question of sport
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In the realms of sport and national identity, logic is an unreliable compass. Yesterday's announcement that a Great Britain football team will compete in the 2012 Olympics merely served to expose the unbridgeable divisions between the various parts of these isles when it comes to the beautiful game. The squad is set to be made up entirely of Englishmen. Yet in South Africa today a sporting team made up of ball players from all over these islands, even the Republic of Ireland, will be begin a tour in perfect harmony.
So why the difference? Why is a true British football team apparently impossible, yet enthusiasm for the British and Irish Lions remains as strong as ever? Some put it down to the greater animosity between regional football governing bodies. Others suggest it is the fear of submergence by the smaller nations.
Whatever the explanation it is rather a shame that oval-shaped balls seem better at uniting Britons than round ones.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments