Leading article: A question of privacy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The fact that Chris Langham was questioned by Kent police 18 days ago as part of an "internet-related" criminal investigation - a thinly veiled reference to the alleged downloading of child pornography - should never have reached the public domain. Although the actor was not charged, this incident was splashed over the front page of a national newspaper yesterday.
The question is how this information came out. It is unlikely to be a coincidence that it emerged in the same week that Mr Langham won the prize for best actor at the British Comedy Awards. As so often in these cases, suspicion inevitably falls on the police for tipping off the media. Even if they were not a source, Kent police still provided enough information when questioned to confirm Mr Langham's identity.
Such is the hysteria surrounding paedophilia that the police have no business confirming or denying anything to do with such investigations.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments