Leading article: A pass is for elected MPs, not for life

Wednesday 14 December 2011 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In some respects, the rules are clear. An MP who earns money outside Parliament which relates in any way to his status as an elected member of the legislature has to make a declaration. In writing. In a register that is regularly updated. There are penalties for those who do not comply. The boastful comments of Tim Collins, managing director of Bell Pottinger, as recently revealed in The Independent, might suggest that professional lobbyists, in contrast, live in a world where no rules apply. But that is not so.

The rules may be weak, but they are written into the constitutions of the professional bodies that represent lobbyists. One of these lays down that no lobbyist should gain an unfair commercial advantage over others by holding a lobby pass that allows him to ply his trade by mingling with politicians in Parliament's corridors and cafés. If a lobbyist does hold a parliamentary pass, he is not supposed to put it to professional use.

As The Independent discloses today, however, there is a gaping anomaly. When MPs leave Parliament, they are entitled for the rest of their lives to hold passes giving them free access to the building. This used to be a simple kindness for people retiring after a lifetime of public service, but it has become increasingly common for MPs who leave politics with many years of working life ahead of them to exploit opportunities to earn bigger salaries outside.

Many put their political experience to profitable use by accepting posts with lobbying firms or other organisations that need access to politicians. In this line of business, a parliamentary pass is a highly valuable, marketable asset.

There is no reason why former MPs should not prosper in their life after politics, but it seems extraordinary that they are permitted to hold on to a privilege that goes with their former status in perpetuity. The solution is simple. For as long as they keep their passes, ex-MPs should have to sign a new register of interests, similar to the one that applies to MPs. But there should be a maximum period – two years, perhaps, or the life of the next Parliament – for which the pass would be valid. Thereafter, an ex-MP would be treated like an ordinary member of the voting public.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in