Leading article: A new prescription that may be too late

Sunday 28 June 2009 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Gordon Brown will try again to seize the initiative when he announces a package of eye-catching reforms to the public sector today. The core idea of "Building Britain's Future" is to get away from that pre-eminent symbol of Blair-era government, the micro-management of myriad targets, in exchange for the delivery of few, more manageable, consumer "entitlements".

What this means in the health service, for example, as the Health Secretary, Andy Burnham, tells The Independent today, is that if a Primary Care Trust is unable to give cancer patients a specialist appointment within a fortnight of referral, it will be obliged to fund their private consultation. This all marks a change of gear on Mr Brown's part, a philosophical shift away from the centralising trend that he inherited from Tony Blair and has perpetuated. If the changes cut the amount of form-filling in the NHS, they are welcome. Targets may have had some use at first but were a blunt instrument, and doctors rightly complained that their use distorted NHS priorities and accentuated an unhealthy top-down management culture.

Whether any of these initiatives are sufficiently radical to reform the gargantuan NHS, or transform Labour's standing, is another matter. With no more than a year to go before an election, the success of this package is critical to Mr Brown's political fight-back. Long vulnerable to the charge of lacking vision, this is his riposte.

The great problem for Mr Brown is that these reforms come almost two years to the day since he became Prime Minister – two years marked by drift and incrementalism. His problem is compounded by the fact that many people have stopped listening to MPs altogether in the wave of the revelations about parliamentarians' expenses. The timing is doubly infelicitous in that they are being pushed forward in a recession.

Even the best reforms require the investment of some money up front. But the public is now more sceptical about the value it is getting from public services than it was two years ago. In other words, Mr Brown may benefit little from his latest proposals unless he can persuade the public that he is plotting a path to a more efficient health service.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in