Leading article: A long overdue departure
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It is welcome that Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has resigned. For months now his Government has been paralysed by allegations against him. Public support for him has plummeted. His Cabinet has been in open revolt. But his statement that he intends to go in two long months' time is too tardy.
Mr Olmert has been a weak leader ever since the Israeli government inquiry blamed his bad planning for the botched invasion of Lebanon. That came after some significant personal achievements. Mr Olmert steadied the ship of state, and the infant Kadima party, in the uncertain times after his predecessor Ariel Sharon suffered a stroke and went into a coma. He then relaunched peace talks with the Palestinians, which had been in the doldrums for eight years, and engaged in indirect talks with Syria, consolidating Mr Sharon's centrist course for peace.
But after the Lebanon inquiry he was a lame duck. Then came allegations that he took envelopes of money from the US businessman Morris Talansky and that he double-claimed for expenses when he was trade minister and mayor of Jerusalem. He has faced four other corruption investigations – on allegations all of which he denies – during his time in office.
Little can be achieved in the two extra months he has given himself in office. The peace talks with the Palestinians and Syrians will stall, despite assurances to the contrary. The ruling party will be plunged into a succession battle at a time of heightened tension over Iran's refusal to abandon its nuclear programme, on which Israel has hinted at air strikes.
Mr Olmert is only going after soundings that he would have come last in his own party leadership contest. He also clearly wants to spare himself the potential indignity of being indicted for corruption while in office. He could have done more. Peace is inevitably negotiated by strong leaders and Israel cannot afford to have a weak one. It is to be hoped that the forthcoming contest will resolve that, though the Israeli electoral system which gives undue weight to small extreme parties will far from guarantee this. Ehud Olmert would have done his country and the region a service had he stepped down much earlier.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments