Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It is difficult to overstate the seriousness of the debacle that was the Serious Fraud Office's high-profile investigation of the property tycoons Vincent and Robert Tchenguiz. Indeed, the High Court judgment against the SFO yesterday represents a wholesale challenge to the competence and, worse still, good faith of the organisation which investigates and prosecutes complex fraud cases in the UK.
The court ruled that, in pursuing the Tchenguiz brothers in connection with the collapsed Icelandic bank, Kaupthing, the SFO obtained search warrants unlawfully to allow it to conduct dawn raids, in a blaze of publicity, at the height of the credit crunch in 2008. It did so by misrepresenting facts to a judge in a manner which was both inadequate and unfair. The SFO then lost documents, overlooked key financial reports and accepted information from complainants' accountants without independently checking it. It unlawfully kept evidence seized in the raids. All this, one judge said, amounted to "sheer incompetence".
The Tchenguiz case – dropped by the SFO in June – is bad enough. Yesterday's judgment on the illegal warrants can only add to the brothers' case for damages. But the implications for the future are graver still, not least because the SFO has since been given the much bigger job of investigating the Libor-fixing scandal that recently engulfed Barclays. And the High Court says the organisation lacks both the human and financial resources it needs to pursue complex economic crimes. Some reform has begun, with the appointment of David Green QC to lead the organisation. But there is more to do if the agency's reputation for competence is to be recovered.
The most obvious lesson to be drawn from the mess of the Tchenguiz inquiry is that such complex and high-profile cases can only be pursued with the utmost fastidiousness. But there is another, broader point, too. With its reputation in tatters and the very real prospect of a vast bill for damages, the SFO might be tempted to retreat altogether. That would be worse. It is up to Mr Green to remedy the SFO's shortcomings, not hide from them.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments