Leading article: A conflict of interest in the police
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It is hardly surprising that private companies hoping to win contracts with the police service are trying to sign up as many former officers as they can. Neither is there anything inherently wrong with them doing so: it is in all our interests, after all, that their expertise be put to use.
There are, however, two issues that must be resolved. One is the potential conflict of interest of an officer making decisions for their force in the knowledge that they are about to shift to a job in the private sector. With some police officers able to retire as early as 50, there must also be a question about the state paying a full pension to someone pursuing a lucrative second career in business by dint of their public sector experience.
At the very least, there should be a mandatory "cooling off" period for officers making the switch. And with the volume of private police work rapidly expanding, there is no time to waste.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments