Leading article: A bigger Europe has not made sweeter music
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Pity the poor people of Liechstenstein. They, along with the Czech Republic, have never submitted an entry to the Eurovision Song Contest, apparently because of a lack of available musical talent. Those who watched the contest this weekend could be forgiven for wondering how bad this paucity of musicianship must be.
It takes the sardonic Terry Wogan adequately to describe the sorry procession of tuneless, untalented or downright ridiculous entries that paraded across our screens on Saturday night. Without Mr Wogan, in fact, the show would be unwatchable.
Time was when Britain tuned into the Eurovision Song Contest and actually cared about the outcome. We sang along with Sandie Shaw in 1967, cheered Lulu on in 1969 and commiserated with Cliff Richard when "Congratulations" came second in 1968. Back then less than 20 European nations took part, compared to the 37 countries this year. The merits of an enlarged Europe have been debated many times, but one thing is clear - it has not resulted in a better Eurovision Song Contest.
This is lowest-common-denominator television at its most gruesome, a triumph of show over substance, exacerbated by a demonstration of political bias that makes the voting patterns of the UN Security Council look like an exercise in unity. No doubt the BBC will point to vast viewing figures (the result, more probably, of the complete lack of anything else to watch). That the competition was won by a group described as "horror rock", dressed in grotesque masks and firing jets of flame, seems, somehow, only too appropriate.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments