Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Of all the unenviable positions in which the Chancellor may find himself, the contortions over bonuses at Royal Bank of Scotland are as challenging as any. Although a formal approach is yet to be made, executives are primed to approach George Osborne (as their main shareholder) for permission – needed under new European laws – to hand senior staff a windfall worth twice their salaries.
There are good reasons for the Chancellor to concur, not least his own fight against Brussels’ bonus cap (largely on the grounds that it will not be effective). With RBS still 81 per cent taxpayer-owned, there is also a strong argument for retaining – and encouraging – the top talent needed to turn the ailing institution around. Finally, if the bank’s case as to why such generosity is earned is compelling, then the Chancellor must surely act accordingly.
The problem here is the politics. It did not need Labour’s demand that the expected bonus request be blocked to galvanise public opinion. With swathes of Britain still feeling the pinch after five years of stagnation – much of the blame for which must fall to the banks – the spectacle of “business as usual” come bonus season would never have passed unremarked. For a Chancellor who is already, rightly or wrongly, caricatured as a “posh boy”, out of touch with normal people, the situation is trickier still.
David Cameron did his best to lance the boil yesterday, using Prime Minister’s Questions to stress that the bank’s remuneration bill will not be allowed to rise (a less meaningful pledge than it might seem, given recent sharp cuts in staff numbers) and to promise that cash bonuses will be limited to £2,000 next year (although there was no mention of share awards).
All of which only underlines the need for the state to sell its bank stakes as swiftly as possible: business should not be complicated by politics. In the meantime, however, Mr Osborne’s problematic choice remains. The politics must, in this instance, take precedence. With RBS facing yet more “substantial” losses, and still being widely criticised for its failure to support small businesses, mega-bonuses are simply not defensible, whatever RBS’s internal logic might be.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments