Even today, it is worth sending explorers into space

Thursday 12 October 2000 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

"They all laughed at Wilbur and his brother/ When they said that man could fly" (in Ira Gershwin's famous lyric). They all laughed, too, back in 1981, when the ungainly space shuttle fired off from Florida on its first mission to space and returned to New Mexico with several of its protective tiles missing or blackened. What was the point, it was asked again and again, of sending a manned, reusable vehicle into space? It would soon be out of date, and it would prove much more expensive than cheaper unmanned rockets for launching satellites.

"They all laughed at Wilbur and his brother/ When they said that man could fly" (in Ira Gershwin's famous lyric). They all laughed, too, back in 1981, when the ungainly space shuttle fired off from Florida on its first mission to space and returned to New Mexico with several of its protective tiles missing or blackened. What was the point, it was asked again and again, of sending a manned, reusable vehicle into space? It would soon be out of date, and it would prove much more expensive than cheaper unmanned rockets for launching satellites.

The 100th launch of the shuttle provides a moment to take stock. First, the technology has lasted nearly two decades, although the design had to be revamped after the 25th shuttle launch, the disastrous Challenger mission, exploded in 1986. Second, the shuttle has enabled much useful repair work to be done on orbiting satellites, from boosting them into higher, more stable orbits to, most notably, replacing the defective mirror in the Hubble Space Telescope. And although the shuttle is American, Nasa has trained and utilised astronauts from many countries, with the consequence that this particular technology has always seemed something of a world-wide adventure.

The arguments against utilising the expensive technology associated with manned space travel are now being repeated over the construction of a permanent orbiting space station. Yesterday's mission by the space shuttle Discovery, flown by four Americans and a Japanese, took with it two new pieces of kit for the embryonic $60bn space station. That project, too, is an international one, sponsored by the United States, Russia, Europe, Japan and Canada.

The success of the manned shuttle missions, though, have shown that there is no substitute for human intelligence in space. Robotics are simply not sophisticated enough to solve the unpredictable problems that arise. The floating space station will not only be a permanent zero-gravity laboratory, but it will test the possibilities of putting people in permanent bases, first on the Moon, and then the planets, where the possibilities for mining minerals and making new discoveries are endless.

One of the astronauts on Discovery, space-walker Bill McArthur, alive to both the romance and history of aviation, has taken with him a piece of fabric from the Wright flyer that took off from Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, in 1903. His gesture is aptly symbolic of the bold thrill of escaping our planet's surface. In Gershwin's words: "Ho ho ho/ Who's got the last laugh now?"

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in