Editorial: Names in rape cases that need to be named

This week provided an equally graphic example of why, on balance, it is right to identify the accused

Independent Voices
Friday 03 May 2013 13:39 EDT

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

There would appear to be a patent unfairness in the fact that someone who says she has been raped – usually a woman – has the right to remain anonymous, while the alleged perpetrator – usually a man – invariably has his name made public.

This week offered a graphic illustration. Malcolm Blackman, an organiser of the Occupy protest in London, was acquitted on two charges of rape while at the camp, but complained that his reputation was still ruined. His case will add to the growing calls for those accused of rape and sexual assault to enjoy the same anonymity as the victim, until and unless they are convicted.

But this week provided an equally graphic example of why, on balance, it is right to identify the accused. After the name of the veteran broadcaster Stuart Hall was released following his arrest, many more women came forward to relate similar experiences. Hall, it emerged, had a pattern of such behaviour over many years; his denials could not withstand the litany of accusations; he pleaded guilty to multiple charges.

Someone wrongly accused of rape has reason to feel aggrieved, but ultimately obtains justice in court. A victim too frightened or ashamed to report a rape is deprived of justice for ever.

Comments on this article are closed for legal reasons

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in