Editorial: More care is needed, but so is a cure

 

Wednesday 19 September 2012 18:26 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Yesterday's disclosure in this paper that the world's leading drug companies are giving up on the search for a cure for Alzheimer's disease, following the failure of several high-profile trials, is grim news for the millions who will, in time, succumb to the condition. It is estimated that 36 million people worldwide were living with dementia in 2009, most suffering from Alzheimer's disease, and the number is set to grow to 115 million by 2050.

But it is not only sufferers who stand to lose, as the disease strips them of their dignity and personality. The human and financial cost is rising as populations age, imposing an ever-greater burden on the rest of us. Governments are starting to respond – with announcements by David Cameron in the UK, Barack Obama in the US and former President Nicolas Sarkozy in France of initiatives to improve management and treatment of the disease.

In Britain, we are especially poor at caring for people with Alzheimer's. Many sufferers end up in hospital because of the lack of support in the community. Some argue, rightly, that putting extra funds into improving care – increasing social work support, expanding day-centre provision – would deliver more benefit for patients than investing in drugs of limited benefit.

But we cannot avoid the fact that Alzheimer's, and other forms of dementia, are increasing rapidly as the population ages and, unless we find some means of curbing its growth, it may overwhelm our capacity to care for its victims. The search for new drugs must go on. But the drug industry, chastened by its recent failures, is switching focus to symptomatic treatments and abandoning the hunt for a "cure".

Alzheimer's takes 15 years to develop, and the cost and difficulty of researching treatments that must be started early in the disease's course to be effective is prohibitive. They cannot be supported by the drug industry alone. Public investment is required in basic science to deliver the breakthroughs from which the industry can deliver new treatments.

We spend 12 times more on cancer research than on researching dementia, yet dementia costs society twice as much. Cancer does not need less – but dementia must have more.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in