Editorial: Inheritance tax freeze proves Osborne is not a master strategist after all
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Amid the commotion over the Government's stab at solving the vexed question of social care for the elderly, one detail received less prominence than it might have. In order to fund the reforms, the inheritance tax threshold will be frozen at £325,000 until at least 2019.
That, in itself, is of no great moment. Except it was George Osborne's 2007 promise to raise the threshold to £1m that secured the then-shadow Chancellor a reputation as a master strategist that even last year's farrago of Budget U-turns failed to entirely undermine. More significant still, the pledge spooked Gordon Brown into putting off a general election that he would in all likelihood have won, in favour of one, three years later, few doubted he would lose.
The £1m inheritance tax policy thus changed Britain's political history. Now, however, it is to slip away with barely a murmur. A master strategy, then – or just unprincipled expediency?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments