Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Nabila Rehman and her brother Zubair, picking okra in their garden, posed no threat to the United States or anyone else, but that did not keep them safe. The pair, aged nine and 13, were injured by shrapnel from a drone-launched missile that killed their grandmother and wounded five other children at the family home in North Waziristan, in Pakistan’s north-western border zone.
Yesterday, as we report, they confronted the United States Congress with the ugly reality of the drone attacks, which under Barack Obama have become an increasingly important part of the US response to terrorism. Attack from the air is always terrifying, but drones, guided by faceless technicians thousands of miles away, are in a league of their own. However the ethical objections to their use, not as battlefield weapons but as tools of assassination with inevitable collateral death and injury to the innocent, have been swept aside by their apparent military effectiveness. For both the US and the Pakistani government – which, as revealed last week, has secretly colluded in the strategy – drones may seem the perfect answer to liquidating dangerous militants in Pakistan’s treacherous no-man’s-land.
But the fury they provoke, often justified, as Nabila and Zubair’s testimony brings out, makes them extremely counter-productive. If Mr Obama believes this is the way to make the world a safer place, he is gravely mistaken.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments