Dirty tricks, disorder and a rigged election

Monday 22 November 2004 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Ukraine was last night teetering on the brink of disorder after a presidential election that was at best suspiciously short on transparency and at worst outrageously rigged. In scenes reminiscent of disputed elections everywhere, supporters of the supposedly defeated candidate, Viktor Yushchenko, mounted mass demonstrations, while Kiev and the westernmost city of Lviv declared open revolt, recognising Mr Yushchenko as the winner.

Ukraine was last night teetering on the brink of disorder after a presidential election that was at best suspiciously short on transparency and at worst outrageously rigged. In scenes reminiscent of disputed elections everywhere, supporters of the supposedly defeated candidate, Viktor Yushchenko, mounted mass demonstrations, while Kiev and the westernmost city of Lviv declared open revolt, recognising Mr Yushchenko as the winner.

This worst of almost all possible outcomes had been on the cards long before the campaign began. The outgoing president, Leonid Kuchma, had backed his prime minister, Viktor Yanukovych, proclaiming him the candidate of stability. Mr Yanukovych, who favours close relations with Russia, also had the very public backing of President Putin. Mr Yushchenko campaigned on pro-Western platform of Nato membership and free-market reform, and enjoyed the equally overt backing of the US.

There was nothing inherently bad about any of this. The two candidates offered quite different visions for the country. Ukrainians had a real choice of the sort that only the Baltic States among the former Soviet satellites have so far managed to offer their voters. And this was a real election: opinion polls consistently showed the result was too close to call. It was not a foregone conclusion.

This did not prevent Mr Yanukovych and his backers from trying to make it so. Dirty tricks abounded. OSCE monitors judged that both the first round and Sunday's run-off fell far short of European norms. The US Senator Richard Lugar spoke of "a concerted and forceful programme of fraud".

Continuing discord is now guaranteed. However the election is eventually resolved, half the population will not accept the result. If Mr Yanukovych is declared president, his international credibility will be near zero; Ukraine will be left out in the cold. Its course will be inward and eastward, not outward into Europe. The minor consolation is that the government machine was unable to guarantee its candidate the sort of landslide victory the old Soviet regimes once delivered. Scarred but defiant, Mr Yushchenko is vociferously contesting the result.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in