Brexit is a tragic diversion of resources from the nation’s real priorities

Even those who still want to leave the European Union must recognise that the attempt to do so has been and is a huge diversion of time, energy and resources from other government priorities.

As we report today, Theresa May has postponed a long list of “ghost policies” under pressure from Brexit preparations. In addition to long-term plans for the NHS and social care, both shelved until the new year, her government has put off new measures against domestic violence, a ban on wild animals from circuses, a new law against exploitative ground rent increases for leaseholders and new rules to stop employers taking staff tips.

The way in which Whitehall capacity is being soaked up by Brexit was illustrated dramatically this week by news that 600 staff at the Department for International Development are being temporarily deployed to other departments.

And it is not just legislation that is being slowed down by the Brexit bottleneck. One issue that has come to front of public awareness is the rise in rough sleeping in all of Britain’s big cities and towns.

This does not need legislation – despite the suggestion by Jeremy Corbyn that the Vagrancy Act 1824 should be repealed. So it should, but it is not important. What makes the difference to the prevalence of rough sleeping is political will, activist government and determined leadership.

It is not easy. It means tackling the mental health and addiction problems that underlie most individual cases, as well as the shortage of decent housing. But it can be done, and was done under the Labour government, to the point where rough sleeping was reduced to close to the minimum possible – and indeed to the point where we as a society and politicians as a government became complacent about it.

It would be perfectly possible to get the numbers of rough sleepers back down, but it needs ministerial and prime ministerial commitment and focus.

Every now and again Ms May makes a big speech where she repeats her brave words on the step of 10 Downing Street when she became prime minister. She reminds herself, and us, that she saw the vote to leave the EU as about much more than our relationship with other European countries. It was a demand for a better society, in which people gain more control over their lives and the “burning injustices” of modern Britain are tackled.

But then she and her ministers are sucked back into the maw of Brexit, and everything else is put aside for the critical negotiation, the crucial vote and the urgent preparation for the worst.

Insouciant small-staters might make light of all this, saying that Belgium, for example, is better governed for not having a government for long periods of time. This is not a view The Independent shares. Government has the power to do good. Energetic, committed and idealistic ministers can make a difference. It is a national tragedy that their efforts are being diverted into the swamp that is Brexit.