As seen with Benefits Street, TV is a powerful medium that must be used responsibly

Whatever side one might take in debate over welfare, the farrago has been an indisputable reminder of the power of television

Editorial
Tuesday 18 February 2014 14:33 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The five episodes of Channel 4’s fly-on-the-wall documentary about life on welfare were certainly controversial. Benefits Street was the subject parliamentary questions to the Prime Minister and a slew of complaints to Ofcom. Even as commentators on the political right claimed the show as evidence of an underclass abandoned to the “welfare trap”, those on the left decried it as “poverty porn” that was at best misrepresentative, at worst outright exploitative. Meanwhile, participants complained that they were misled by TV executives about the nature of the programme, which prompted four arrests (for drugs and firearms offences), torrents of abuse on Twitter and allegations that featured children were being bullied in school.

Whatever side one might take in debate over welfare, and whatever one’s conclusions regarding the exploitation – or not – of the residents of Birmingham’s James Turner Street, the farrago has been an indisputable reminder of the power of television. Deirdre Kelly – aka White Dee – who featured in the documentary and also took part in this week’s spin-off panel debate, is even planning to become an independent MP.

Nor does the long reach of the television executive begin and end with documentary. As we report today, British East-Asian actors have written to the Culture Secretary to complain at their simultaneous under- and mis-representation in BBC programming. Not only are high-profile series such as Casualty and Eastenders notably lacking in East-Asian characters, the few that do make an appearance are negatively stereotyped, the artists claim.

The latest report from Demos only underlines the point. Research conducted by the think tank indicates that false stereotyping of young people across the media, including television, is eroding already difficult job prospects. Although the vast majority of youngsters believe their generation to be more concerned with social issues than their predecessors, teenagers are routinely portrayed as disengaged, binge-drinking yobs.

Television is not, of course, the sole arbiter of social mores. But its power is undeniable, and, as Voltaire notably put it, with great power comes great responsibility.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in