A cut to welcome? A good case has been made for halving prison numbers

 

Editorial
Sunday 06 September 2015 14:34 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It is not often that the Chancellor’s plans to slash a government department’s spending get a hearty cheer from a liberal or left-of-centre corner. But George Osborne has found an unexpected, not to say unlikely, ally in the shape of the Howard League for Penal Reform, which says that cutting the prison population by about half would shave at least a quarter off the justice ministry’s budget, neatly meeting Mr Osborne’s financial target for non-ringfenced departments.

The point is both ironic and seriously made at the same time. It seems perverse that Britain’s prison population has almost doubled since the 1990s when there is no evidence that the number of crimes and criminals has also doubled over the same period. On the contrary, by most indices crime rates have fallen year on year since around 2000, including the rate of violent crime, echoing a pattern throughout the Western world. Yet still the jails fill up and more spaces have to be made.

A succession of ministers has promised to clear prisons of non-violent offenders and of people serving very short sentences but thousands remain there on remand or awaiting sentence, as do several thousand women, few of whom have committed a violent offence.

Clearly, no party in search of votes is going to pledge to suddenly empty the nation’s jails. However, we could stop filling them up in the first place and be more judicious about who gets sent there.

Prisons are expensive to run. According to the Ministry of Justice’s own figures, each place costs about £35,000 a year. If that is what it takes to keep the country safe from people who pose a physical danger to the public, one could argue that the money is well spent. The “money well spent” argument becomes weaker, however, when we remember that well over two-thirds of the prison population have not committed a violent offence.

There is also evidence that prisons act as “universities of crime”, especially among the young and especially when prisons are overcrowded, which is another reason for not jailing people unless it is strictly necessary. If we treated prison as the last resort, in other words, we might save more than just money.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in