Portraying the human side of a serial killer – like David Tennant achieves in ‘Des’ – does not mean you are glamourising their actions

While not seeking to diminish the pain Nilsen has caused, I believe the criticism of the programme is unfair

Victoria Selman
Wednesday 16 September 2020 12:56 EDT
Comments
Des trailer starring David Tennant

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Des is the new three part true-crime drama series currently airing on ITV and smashing rating records for the channel.

Taking its title from the nickname of Dennis Nilsen, the programme documents the arrest and trial of the man who killed at least 12 young men between 1978 and 1983.

In a high-impact opening, police show up at Nilsen’s flat after a plumber discovers his drains packed with bone and human tissue.

Horrific, is an understatement though as a writer of criminal profiler/serial killer thrillers, I’m as interested in the psychology of the perpetrator as the crime itself. Possibly that’s why I’m so intrigued by Nilsen’s case. 

As David Tennant, the actor playing the murderer says: “It certainly would seem that those who worked with him at the job office found him pleasant enough. Sometimes he would drone on a little, but there was certainly nothing extraordinary, apparently, about this man.”

To me, it’s this aspect that makes the show so compelling. All too often, serial killers are portrayed as bogeymen; monsters, somehow “other”. But the truth is, even the most apparently senseless violence has meaning to the perpetrator. Serial killers are people too – humans who do inhuman things.

Delving into these “inhuman” crimes has naturally been an important part of the programme and has consequently raised the criticism that the show’s producers have somehow glorified Nilsen’s actions. While not seeking to diminish the pain Nilsen has caused, I believe the criticism is unfair. Simply portraying or interrogating a crime on screen is a world away from glorifying it.

Unlike Thomas Harris’ baroque depiction of Hannibal Lecter in Silence of the Lambs, Des is almost mundane, down to its bleak lighting and dour costumes. And just as putting racist words in the mouth of a character doesn’t make an author racist, a TV producer who shows a killer revelling in his crimes, isn’t saying murder is a good thing. It borders on patronising to suggest people can’t tell the difference.

Another criticism levelled at the show is that Nilsen has been given a human face. To my mind though, it’s his very humanity that makes him so fascinating. Des handles it well by focusing not on “who-” but rather “why-dunnit”. It seeks to understand how a person can be so normal on the outside and yet have bodies rotting under his floorboards.

In my novel, Snakes and Ladders, I ask: what makes a person murder someone they’ve never met? What makes them kill stranger after stranger until they’re stopped?

It’s a theme the show explores well in a way viewers can understand, without overstepping the line into the grotesque while also focusing as much on the impact on the victims’ families as the murders themselves.

At no point do the producers attempt to win viewers over to Nilsen’s perspective. This isn’t a series that presents the killer in a tragic light or that shows him struggling with his inner demons. Rather it aims to understand Nilsen’s mindset, which is not at all the same as condoning his actions.

Although it can be more emotionally palatable to see them as two dimensional, serial killers are not black and white horror film villains. They are men and women who look just like us, with friends, families and next-door neighbours.

Highlighting this has nothing to do with idolisation though clearly any portrayal (especially on true crime shows) needs to be handled sensitively. And in fact, done well, programmes like Des can become cautionary tales.

This is borne out by the fact women, who are statistically more likely than men to be the victims of violent crime, are the primary consumers of true crime books and shows – 70 per cent of the total audience according to a recent study.

I would argue this is because as women we want to learn how to better protect ourselves. Or to use a phrase we’ve all heard rather a lot lately, to stay vigilant.

Victoria Selman is the bestselling author of a serial killer thriller series featuring  ex-special forces criminal profiler, Ziba MacKenzie. Her first novel, ‘Blood for Blood’ was shortlisted for the Debut Dagger Award

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in