Debate: After Victoria's Secret apologised for causing offence, is wearing a Native American headdress off limits?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.
What's going on?
Lingerie-makers Victoria's Secret have apologised to the Native American community for the decision to outfit a model in a floor-length headdress at their annual fashion show.
Model Karlie Kloss took to the catwalk wearing high heels and leopard print underwear topped off with a towering headdress, a garment in the style of those traditionally worn by Native American war chiefs and warriors as a symbol of respect.
Erny Zah, a spokesman for the Navaho Nation, said: "We have gone through the atrocities to survive and ensure our way of life continues… Any mockery, whether it's Halloween, Victoria's Secret - they are spitting on us. They are spitting on our culture, and it's upsetting."
Victoria's Secret apologised and promised that footage of Kloss' controversial outfit would not be broadcast or put in any marketing materials.
Earlier this year No Doubt singer Gwen Stefani was also reprimanded for "going native" in a raunchy Cowboys-and-Indians style video. But is this crass cultural appropriation or harmless fun?
Case for: Not your decision
Are you Native American? Have you any idea what their culture is like beyond The Last of the Mohicans? If that's a double "no", then you're already on dangerous ground here. The final say on how offensive this fashion show was must be given to the community whose heritage it unthinkingly sexed-up. Even if you don't agree, what's the point in upsetting an entire people just to sell a few skimpies? Some will call it excessive post-colonial guilt or (sigh) "PC gone mad", but they're wrong. The Native American culture was decimated by white people - it only makes it worse to parade around like everything's all dandy on that score.
Case against: Just an image
Whatever I say, someone's going to call me an imperialist pig. But that's just a sign of how over-sensitized this whole debate has become. Yes, minorities have every right to defend the treasured artifacts of their culture. But the headdress? Come on. I bet all the leftie commentators getting into a huff over this show have one in their dress-up drawer. It's not like Karlie Kloss or Gwen Stefani were wearing Geronimo's own prize possession - what they put on is simply an aesthetic image, one that all cultures should be allowed to share in. If we allow ourselves to think otherwise, there'll be an awful lot of fancy dress shops put out of business.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments