Croydon cat killer: A sadistic crime spree has exposed the law’s failings
The existing penalties for animal cruelty or criminal damage seem inadequate to the task
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The so-called “cat ripper of Croydon” is, in truth, no laughing matter. Whoever he or she is, they must know the suffering they are inflicting, not only on the unfortunate cats but also their owners. One can only assume that this strange individual gains some sadistic pleasure from their activities.
The “cat ripper of Croydon” label is also more than a little offensive, summoning up images of Jack the Ripper. While the Whitechapel murders of 1888 have been parodied and long since passed into folklore, they were what we would now call serious sexual crimes against women.
Like the original Jack the Ripper, there is a degree of unhealthy public fascination with this disturbed individual, though perhaps this time round there will not be any suggestion that the perpetrator is related to the Prince of Wales or assisted by the Queen’s Surgeon.
The killer is careful. None of the cats has any human DNA beneath its claws, which might lead to identification of its slayer. If he or she is ever apprehended then the authorities will have to face the question of what would be an appropriate punishment.
For many animal lovers – fittingly in view of his habit of decapitating his victims – the guillotine or hanging would be too good.
The existing penalties for animal cruelty or criminal damage seem inadequate to the task though, and demonstrate what a poor deterrent they represent to those as mentally unsound as this. A curious and disturbing story, at any rate.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments