The Third Leader: Family silver

Charles Nevin
Wednesday 18 January 2006 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Quite often, I know, you will read a news item in this paper and then turn here hoping for some guidance. Just how significant is the event described? Is it a straw in the wind, a storm in a teapot, a shot across the bow, or a flash in the pan? Today, you'll want to know whether the publicity surrounding the sale by David Cameron's parents of some of their furniture is simply the product of the present preoccupation with their son, or a sign of something deeper.

Hmm. Furniture is very important in the Conservative Party. You will recall Michael Jopling's famous judgement on Michael Heseltine, that he was someone who bought his own furniture. Nicholas Soames is often described as a large wardrobe with a small key. Further back, the Earl of Chesterfield (sofa) was a Whig, but one with Toryish tendencies, and Wellington had a chest named after him as well as the boots.

It's about permanence and provenance as proof of pedigree; without it, you're likely to end up with the son of a circus performer, or, worse, a grocer's daughter prepared, in Macmillan's words, to sell off the family silver.

So it could be that the decision not to buy, but sell off, the family furniture is a cleverly coded signal about the new leader's similarly implacable determination, despite his particular pedigree, to throw out the past, no matter how cherished; or it could be that his parents wanted to sell off some furniture.

Tricky, especially as things didn't go that well. So, sorry, but I'd need more, such as a snatch picture of David studying a MFI catalogue, with or without a tie, before offering anything definitive.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in