The Third Leader: Cut and paste

Charles Nevin
Monday 03 April 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Plagiarism. The taking and using as one's own of the thoughts, writing or inventions of another. Much discussed lately re Raj Persaud, psychiatrist, Vladimir Putin, President and sometime purveyor of an impressive economics dissertation, and every student whose finger has ever hovered shiftily over the "c" key.

A bit of a dodgy one, this. You might recall Tom Lehrer's advice: "Plagiarise, but only be sure always to call it, please, 'research'". And Wilson Mizner: "Copy from one, it's plagiarism; copy from two, it's research". Ah, yes, satire; but, really, nothing is said nowadays that has not been said before: we are all wholesale borrowers.

Look at it this way: the bees pillage the flowers, but they make honey which is all their own. As Dean Inge, the 20th-century churchman, said: "What is originality? Undetected plagiarism." Excellent: you might detect, as well, a certain similarity to Voltaire's: "Originality is nothing but judicious plagiarism." But, again, is there no such thing as two men having similar thoughts on similar occasions?

Surely, too, an inadvertent failure to attribute is pardonable. I myself remember that a tutorial had almost elapsed before my tutor kindly reminded me of the sole source I was closely relying on. Leaving the best until now, I would also point out that, as we are in Iraq largely on the strength of the unacknowledged efforts of a postgraduate student, misplaced commas and all, plagiarism is a vital weapon in the war against terror. Thank you. Sorry? Oh, very well: The Oxford English Dictionary, Norman Vaughan, Terence, Wendell Phillips, Montaigne, S T Coleridge, and John 2:10.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in