Tessa Jowell: The rhetoric is fine, but what about the action?

Saturday 14 May 2011 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One year into the Big Society, David Cameron's big idea has stalled. Soaring political speeches may get headlines, but in practice this rhetoric is contradicted by his Government's actions.

This is a pity, because the result risks discrediting a cherished principle which has defined decently lived lives in communities for generations. Our country is better when communities are strong.

While it is easy to support the rhetoric, the Government's failure to pursue the Big Society through progressive principles in practice means it will fail. Cameron's failure to give leadership, and to ensure action that gives practical definition and consistency to his vision, has been fatal. This is because his real problem is ideological: he is convinced you can either have government or civic action but you can't have both.

This is where free market fundamentalism undermines the Big Society: our economy and our communities are expected to spring to life as soon as government leaves the scene. The invisible hand of society is assumed to replace the invisible hand of the market.

As it says in ACEVO's report, "if we want people to take more responsibility... we will need to give them the encouragement and the vehicles to do so... Government's role must be one of acting as partner, catalyst and mobiliser."

I agree. The Government is foolish to see this essential partnership as statist.

According to a survey of charity leaders, 55 per cent of community groups will cut staff by next month, and 35 per cent will cut services. What we lose in two years may become impossible to rebuild in 10.

So, while we support its aspirations, we call on the Government to recognise that the way forward is to adopt a policy of community where possible, government where necessary.

Tessa Jowell is shadow Cabinet Office minister

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in