Stephen Breyer: The day 'equal under law' meant what it says
From a speech by the Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court, dedicating a National Historic Site in Topeka, Kansas
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Fifty years ago the Supreme Court of the United States decided Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. Here is the question that case presented: "Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other 'tangible' factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities?" The court answered this question unanimously: "We believe that it does."
Fifty years ago the Supreme Court of the United States decided Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. Here is the question that case presented: "Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other 'tangible' factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities?" The court answered this question unanimously: "We believe that it does."
It was a great day - many would say the greatest day - in the history of that institution. Before 17 May 1954, the court read the Constitution's words "equal protection of the laws", as if they protected only the members of the majority race. After 17 May 1954, it read those words as the post-Civil War framers meant them, as offering the same protection to citizens of every race.
Before 17 May 1954, the words "equal justice under law," chiselled in stone above the Supreme Court's door, rang with irony. After 17 May 1954, those words began to mean what they say.
Before 17 May 1954, the court was not a court for all the people. After 17 May 1954, the court began to enforce a law that strives to treat every citizen with equal respect.
Thurgood Marshall, who later became a member of the Supreme Court, represented the schoolchildren in Brown. He argued that separating our children by race violates the Constitution's promise of equal protection. The court agreed, embracing Marshall's argument with a simple affirmation: "We believe that it does."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments