Some healthy advice for the voting public

 

Oliver Wright
Wednesday 10 July 2013 14:47 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In the 1980s the doctors’ trade union, the British Medical Association, ran a successful campaign to discredit the Thatcher Government’s health reforms.

Under a picture of the then Health Secretary Ken Clarke, they posed the question: ‘What do you call a man who ignores doctors’ advice?’ That question is still valid today, but the answer is now the voting public.

The medical profession is broadly agreed that the best way to treat patients with life-threatening conditions is in large specialised units with expert consultants available around the clock. They may take longer to get to, be harder for families to visit, but statistically they improve your chances of leaving that hospital alive. They are also cheaper.

Yet every time a local emergency department is threatened with closure, communities react with outrage. Today’s warning by Sir David Nicholson about the consequences of such opposition is therefore timely. He wants the public to understand clearly that there are choices involved.

With a growing elderly population, greater survival rates and new technology, the pressures on NHS budgets are greater than ever before. He and Sir Bruce Keogh say that “reconfigurations” are not only the best way to save money but also to improve patient care. It may not be popular – but it is good advice.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in