The Sketch: Truth in politics? Trust the Speaker
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.How are we to explain the Speaker's extraordinary behaviour? Politicians never quite mean what they say and certainly don't say what they'll do. Michael Martin is doing precisely what he has promised. Only one answer is possible: he has risen out of the swamp of political life. He has discarded his low acquaintance. He has ascended by Jacob's Ladder into that Elysium where only Speakers can breathe the air. He has become the remote and rather awful Old Testament character Speakers are supposed to be; in parliamentary terms he is that he is, he is the word. I hope he won't ask me to his Christmas party; if I look at him I'll burst into flames.
Three examples from yesterday. He granted what used to be called a Private Notice Question to the Conservatives. This summons a minister to the House to give an account of him or herself. Yesterday, Mr Thing applied to have the Prime Minister present himself and the request was approved. As Tony Blair had spent a good deal of the morning saying the same things on television it was what people call a victory for Parliament.
Second: Mr Martin had said he wanted to move question time along. Fantastic windbaggery meant we were rarely getting beyond question 10. Yesterday we got to number 25. It's true the batting order collapses if you bowl along faster than normal – MPs who assume they are too far down the list don't turn up and their question is scratched. None the less. Question 25.
And finally, he chose not to select the Conservative amendment for the Iraq debate. Theirs was an anodyne, shoulder-to-shoulder amendment supporting the Government. No, he chose the Liberal Democrat amendment, which ensured a vote would be taken on whether parliament would, prior to a shooting war, be able to vote to authorise it.
Betty Boothroyd encouraged the theatrical aspects of the House, permitting and perhaps encouraging the roaring, operatic duets of PMQs. Michael Martin is cutting back on the show-time and, by the perpetual paradox of political life, producing something more interesting.
Which is more than can be said for Mr Thing. We all agree he was better than expected, yesterday. But this is simply not good enough. For once, the Government is all over the place. Its strategic utterances have the calm coherence of a burning zoo. John Prescott goes live with a public grand mal. The Prime Minister himself is brutally reduced in stature. And people are being burnt to death because of government incompetence. And yet Mr Thing can neither batter the PM; nor can he rally his troops to do it for him.
He hasn't the weight, he hasn't the wallop. If the strike tells us anything it is that the Leader of the Opposition has to go.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments