The Sketch: These backbench Tories are exposing a rankling in the ranks

Simon Carr
Thursday 16 September 2010 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Flashes of reality are coming out of Parliament. There's Nick Clegg's line on benefits – that they're not meant "to recompense" people for being poor. How wonderfully clear and confrontational that is. He's repeating something he said in opposition but what a wallop it carries from the Government front bench.

And the select committees chaired by Tories are causing more problems for the Government than they solve. The ranks are rankling, you see.

For example, Andrew Tyrie is pressing the Treasury to release its private view of how the cuts are going to affect certain sections of society more than others. That's deeply unhelpful.

Also, in the Public Administration committee, Bernard Jenkin is revealing an astonishing absence in the heart of government. He's calling it a search for "a grand strategy" and he ain't found nothing yet.

I'm as sceptical of grand strategies as the next man. But God knows, there are questions that will bear on our future. How do we equip western workers to deal with globalisation? How British do we want Wahhabi immigrants to be, and how do we go about making them so? How do we cope with a 10-million strong underclass in the fourth and fifth generation of state dependency, without recompensing them for their predicament?

What Bernard Jenkin's committee is pointing out is that there is no structure in government that considers questions like these. There is no plan. And very often there isn't the knowledge either. For instance, he hauled in one of the Army's big old Royal Marines to give us a reason for our recent failure in Afghanistan. It wasn't just that there was no grand strategy... "We didn't realise we were moving from a Northern Alliance area to a Pashtun area," he said.

That's like the Afghans invading Europe and attacking Burnley to kill Turkish people. The Royal Marine also said the initial response to 9/11 (bombing Afghanistan) was "non-discretionary" – that it wasn't a matter of "deriving lessons from Elphinstone's retreat".

But Elphinstone's retreat (in which a retreating British garrison was massacred) is the single most important strategic fact for anyone wanting to invade that wonderful country. You can get in easily enough – but how do you get out? We have no honest answer to that.

So Jenkin and his committee is into a rich seam and it'll be worth watching future episodes.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in