The Sketch: Lost without a compass in Lansley's blizzard of drivel
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Opposition Day. Tories on health. They'll be doing this quite a lot, as the years go by. Labour will win the next election because "they still have the ideas" © Nigel Lawson, Tony Blair.
The Tory strategy seems to be to keep talking while they work out what they want to say. So, Andrew Lansley was voluble, energetic, assertive and never more like himself. Obviously I don't mean any of that in a good way. It takes an unusually potent performance to generate sympathy for Patricia Hewitt. Andrew Lansley is probably the only person in Britain who could do it.
It was a parliamentary first. The poor fellow's like a drunk in a bar, immersed in a world of historic wrongs. "And another thing," he says ("after the scandal of the 2.1 per cent of brokerages caused by elsewhere surpluses because the piloting of user-involvement was sham, yes a sham, damn them! The fools, oh God, the fools!") lurching on to you, an arm round your shoulder so you can't get away.
From his first words ("The um, I want to begin if I may") to his last, it's a blizzard of drivel. You've no idea what his theme is, what his values are, what he wants to happen. Just that it's wrong, it's all terribly wrong. His only offered solution was to get ministers to withdraw from the health service (if that's what he means by "setting the NHS free").
But then how will he get these "hardworking professionals" to do what is wanted? Leave it to them to decide? If this principle is ever applied to sketch writing we will make an eloquent case for permanent job security, twice the salary, a parliamentary-style pension (to understand that which we are sketching), and a far better bar service at question time.
Lansley hates ministers involving themselves in the NHS, but he insists we want more leadership. But not by setting targets. He hates targets, but he hates targets being missed. But he likes efficiency targets. But not at the level they've been "arbitrarily set". Does he want them higher? That'll mean more job cuts? Or lower with larger deficits? He doesn't want hospitals to be "bailed out" and yet he doesn't want their budgets cut. I can't follow him. I'm lost in the blizzard, wiping the drivel from my goggles.
"Health inequalities are increasing!" he cries. You don't know where to start with such a remark when made by a Conservative. Does he think it's a good thing or a bad thing? If it's a bad thing, does he want a national target to reduce health inequalities? A hated target? "Patients who should be treated sooner are waiting nearly six months." Ohh! How can a Tory say such a wimpish thing, in view of their fortitude, stoically bearing the suffering of people on waiting lists for years together.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments