The Sketch: I Can't Believe It's Not Heroin!

 

Simon Carr
Tuesday 19 June 2012 12:40 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Black Mamba. White Ivory. Cussons Imperial Leather.

It may not be the case forever, but only one of these items can you currently buy in the superstore. The others are exotic, unpredictable, Class A concoctions from criminal chemists, probably in based China. The things you learn in the Home Affairs committee.

It was drugs morning for the MPs. Goodness knows what Lorraine Fulbrook's on; it was like we were dreaming her. Michael Ellis had taken a big hit of Red Robe (judges can't do without it), and Nicola Blackwood was more than usually well dosed on Miaow, the feline favourite. Sounds sleepy, sharp claws.

Between them all they explained how analog drugs are made by changing molecules in an illegal high and producing something called I Can't Believe It's Not Heroin!

This happens in a week and Parliament spends the next two years trying to identify it, classify it and criminalise it. By then the analog has been digitised into something completely different.

They had in that Prof Nutt who was fired by the previous Government for saying that Ecstasy was less dangerous than riding horses. He has set up his rival committee to argue for decriminalisation of cannabis, by saying how dangerous alcohol is.

He denounces political meddling and claims to be more rational, with his 16-criteria, individually-weighted harm assessment matrix created by experts - but he offers to "work with the committee" to adjust the weighting given to the various factors (something we other experts call "political meddling").

It's a shame because what he wants has much to be said for it, and has a chance of ending the international drug wars. But as long as he continues to say that riding, like class A drugs is addictive, and that the harm that riders do to society has anything to do with heroin and alcohol - he just won't get the traction he needs.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in