The Sketch: Everyone hates terrorists, and they pointed to prove it
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.If it were happening in Africa, people over here wouldn't mind, it might not even register. Eight hundred dead in Gaza? The world has a dozen countries where 800 violent deaths are hardly noticed.
But that part of Middle East exercises the Commons. Voices were raised yesterday, names called. Those of one disposition denounced mass murderers, those on the other side did the same. Everyone abhorred terrorism and terrorists, and pointed as they did so.
Peter Hain told us our experience in Northern Ireland had given Britain important lessons in these matters. It's hard to agree with that proposition. The frivolous, pleasure-seeking, happy-go-lucky, turn-the-other-cheek Ulstermen – they're no guide to Middle East politics.
David Miliband sought to pour oil on the waters but it felt more like oil vapour on water vapour. Reconciliation was essential, he said. There were responsibilities on all sides. There were benefits in peace, we learnt, but war caused pain and death. He was careful not to be led into controversy but when asked if a ceasefire should involve both sides, he was able to agree, cautiously. But, he emphasised, it was important this didn't become pro or anti-Israel or Palestine.
So, for instance, recalling our ambassador would imply we were somehow taking sides. Only in one area did he feel comfortable naming the guilty parties. The real villains turned out to be a shadowy group called "the international community". Bastards!
That may have meant George Bush. He wasn't including Britain in his condemnation, obviously – our own Tony Blair is out there working for peace (he was a minister in the British government some years ago). Gordon Brown has called for a ceasefire – and has done so both "publicly and privately". Courage, you see. He wrote the book of it.
Further, "the international community" has redeemed itself with "a clear call for a durable ceasefire". It was the result of "intense, unifying work" the UN wrote out in Resolution 1860. Clear, strong, authoritative. And, he told us, "rejected by all sides".
It was a lighter moment, I'm not sure he saw it like that.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments