Simon Carr: Defence reform is more fog of war than clarity of purpose
Sketch: The MoD would be fourth in the FTSE if it were a private company
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.If they want to add clarity so much they could start by renaming the Ministry of Defence the Ministry of War. But it's never going to happen, is it? In the event, the Defence Reform thing was the most opaque statement about transparency we'd heard for many years.
The first I understood was the phrase about a new omnipotent control board that was going to be "based around the Defence Secretary". That's him, I knew that much. Liam Fox was going to take control of whatever it was.
And what exactly was that? My notes record the importance he placed on the underpinning themes that were going to deliver defence outputs in a new planning model where stovepiping would be replaced by the single service building blocks to become joint enablers, with joint credentials, jointly thinking about the levers that budget- holders were going to be provided with.
It's where the fog of war starts.
The big thing, Liam Fox said was to "maximise delivery at the front end". In the context of the last decade of British military history that translates as "more dead Arabs". But that might be a little too transparent for comfort.
However, when asked if he was going to chair the new Defence Board, he replied in a particular way, "Oh, yes". That made people laugh, so they all seemed to be in on it.
James Arbuthnot called it "a truly radical shake-up and something they've needed for decades". He was particularly pleased with the service chiefs getting more control over their budgets: "Does the Treasury share my delight?"
There are tensions between the Minister and the political quarterdeck so the cognescenti chuckled when Fox replied: "They've agreed, so the spirit in which they've entered into this is really not my concern."
There are astonishing sums splashed around in buying agents of death (not least army food), and the MoD would be fourth in the FTSE if it were a private company. It was absurd that the people drafting contracts, Julian Brazier said, should be in post for only two years. "I shall be encouraging the PM to read Hansard on that point." More grim chuckling.
It would be a great pity if his enemies did manage to dispose of Dr Fox. He adds texture. And there's always the thrilling possibility of Oliver Letwin getting punched on the nose.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments