Simon Calder: Not all contributors are motivated by desire to help

Wednesday 20 July 2011 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Many tourists rely upon TripAdvisor – and, as a result, the fortunes of much of the tourism industry depends upon the blend of recommendation and deprecation. But before you plan your next holiday on the basis of what complete strangers have written, consider their motivations.

Many users match the ideal profile: public-spirited individuals who want to share their experiences, whether marvellous or mediocre, with prospective travellers. They are keen to reward businesses that provide excellent value, and to censure squalid hotels and tacky tourist attractions. But there is also a constituency of users who use TripAdvisor in the same way that incensed motorists call the freephone "How's my driving?" number on the back of poorly driven trucks: it is a proxy for making a complaint. Review sites comprise a medium made for the British – at least those of us too timid to demand to see the manager.

More sinister are reviews that are planted to achieve a commercial goal. The greater the power of TripAdvisor, the stronger the temptation covertly to brag about your own enterprise and to slag off your opponents.

The industry is rife with gossip about techniques ranging from friendly encouragement ("If you didn't like the service, tell us; if you did, tell TripAdvisor") to manipulation on an industrial scale using scores of false identities. In its defence, the company stresses that it has systems to identify rogue reviews.

As travellers who rely on TripAdvisor celebrate the 50 million mark, those have yet to try it should embrace the concept enthusiastically. But use it wisely. A recommendation from someone you know and trust is worth 100 strangers' ratings.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in