Sara Malm: Going on strike is disgraceful, selfish and, quite frankly, passé

iWriters

Sara Malm
Friday 13 April 2012 07:05 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

How would you classify a group of people that take hostages to make themselves heard? Put on any decent Liam Neeson movie and they're called criminals. Come to Britain in the 21st century and they are called workers' unions. Exaggerating? I don't think so.

I do not have children (yet), but if I did then the proposed teachers' strike would knock me off my feet. Strikes prevent hardworking people from putting food on their tables, they confine them to their homes and, yes, hold economic growth and opportunities hostage for all of us.

It is a selfish, disgraceful and, quite frankly, passé behaviour which has no place in a market economy, especially not one four years into a recession.

NASUWT's general secretary Chris Keates said: "It will be entirely the responsibility of the coalition government, not teachers." She cannot be further from the truth – it will be entirely the responsibility of all the people forced to pick up your slack, not David Cameron or Nick Clegg.

What about parents facing the prospect of losing their jobs (because unlike you union workers, when the rest of us do not show up for work, we get fired) when the only other unthinkable option available to them is to leave their children at home unsupervised? Or small business owners with no one to pile their workload on? And for those who are able to book time off work; why on earth should they have to use their hard-earned holiday days to cover for you? I would really love to see you argue with these people why your six-week summer holiday is "essential".

If there is one thing that I have learnt from six years working entry-level jobs, it is that when someone pulls a sickie, everyone else on the floor has to work twice as hard, while the people at the top remain untouched. And if everyone on the floor knows you went out last night – ie, you don't actually need a sick day – you can expect a very icy welcome back the next day. So no matter how much you have cured your hangover, there is a whole new issue on the table.

True, there was a time when I too put on a sour face, folded my arms and plonked my behind in a corner until I got what I wanted and thought I deserved.

But time passed, my two front teeth came through and I learnt that this is not the way to solve a conflict. I am not a politician nor a union leader, but if a five-year-old can understand that compromise and zero aggression gets you further than stomping your feet, then you can too. So do what I did. Grow a pair.

The writer is studying Journalism and the News Industry at the University of Kent.

Simon Kelner is away

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in