Samuel Alito: 'I have often asked myself: How in the world did I get here?'

From the opening statement by the Federal Appeals Court judge to the US Senate Judiciary Committee at his confirmation hearings for the Supreme Court

Tuesday 10 January 2006 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

During the previous weeks, an old story about a lawyer who argued a case before the Supreme Court has come to my mind. This was a lawyer who had never argued a case before the court before. And when the argument began, one of the justices said, "How did you get here?", meaning how had his case worked its way up through the court system. But the lawyer was rather nervous and he took the question literally and he said, "I came here on the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad."

I have often asked myself, "How in the world did I get here?" And I want to try to answer that today. I got here in part because of the community in which I grew up. It was a warm, down-to-earth community. Most of the adults in the neighbourhood were not college graduates.

After I graduated from high school, I went a full 12 miles down the road, but really to a different world when I entered Princeton University. A generation earlier, somebody from my background probably would not have felt fully comfortable at a college like Princeton.

This was back in the late 1960s and early 1970s. It was a time of turmoil at colleges and universities. And I saw some very smart people and very privileged people behaving irresponsibly. And I couldn't help making a contrast between some of the worst of what I saw on the campus and the good sense and the decency of the people back in my own community.

Of course, I have been shaped for the last 15 years by my experiences as a judge of the court of appeals. When I became a judge, I stopped being a practising attorney. And that was a big change in role. The role of a practising attorney is to achieve a desirable result for the client in the particular case at hand. But a judge can't think that way. A judge can't have any agenda, a judge can't have any preferred outcome in any particular case and a judge certainly doesn't have a client.

The judge's only obligation - and it's a solemn obligation - is to the rule of law. And what that means is that in every single case, the judge has to do what the law requires.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in