Rupert Cornwell: Spillages and scandals: an 'annus horribilis' BP would like to forget

Tuesday 16 January 2007 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

For BP and its North American operations, 2006 has truly been the annus horribilis - a series of setbacks, accidental and self-inflicted, which have defeated every attempt by the company to restore its reputation after the calamity at the Texas City oil refinery.

Even if it had not put a foot wrong, this would have been a difficult period for a major energy company seeking to put the accident behind it, while it was reporting record profits on the back of the same soaring oil and gas prices bringing misery to ordinary consumers. BP unfortunately couldn't put a foot right.

First came a crude oil leak on Alaska's North Slope, discovered in March and involving the equivalent of 200,000 barrels of oil. Soon after, corrosion problems crippled its Prudhoe Bay field that produces 400,000 barrels of crude per day. The company was also blamed for a separate, far smaller, spill of refined products in Long Beach.

At hearings in Washington in September, Congressmen mocked BP's pretensions to be a defender of the environment. "Shame, shame, shame," thundered Joe Barton, the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. So much for the "Beyond Petroleum" slogans, launched by the eco-friendly behemoth created after the mergers with Amoco in December 1998 and Arco in 2000.

Three months before that, in June, BP was embroiled in allegations of price gouging, seeming to confirm every public suspicion about the behaviour of profit-laden oil companies. Regulators charged it with trying to corner the market in propane, driving the price up by 50 per cent during the winter of 2004.

Prosecutors produced recordings of BP traders saying, among other things: "What we stand to gain is not just that we'd make money out of it. But we would know from thereafter that we could control the market at will." The company denied the allegations, but fired several traders.

Regulators also reopened previous investigations of alleged crude oil price manipulation at the oil group, and investigated possible irregularities in petrol futures contract trading, dating back to 2002 and 2003. Whether or not the moves were, as widely believed, a tactic to step up pressure over the propane charges, the victim, once again, was BP's reputation.

The scandals even drew civil rights leader Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Coalition into the fray. Pickets have demonstrated at some of the company's petrol stations, accusing it of price gouging and racial discrimination, by not appointing black people in its senior management.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in