Richard Koch: 'Individualism is replacing managerial capitalism'
From the Halifax lecture, delivered at the Royal Society for the Arts in London
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.EM Forster wrote: "Failure or success seem to have been allocated to men by their stars. But they retain the power of wriggling, and in the universe the only really interesting movement is this wriggle."
I am going to argue that there is a lot more wriggling going on nowadays; given enough wriggling, the nature of the whole system changes. Individualism is replacing managerial capitalism. What is the evidence for the rise of the individual?
Consider how the economy grows. Does it grow because big companies march ever forward, or because small companies grow from nothing into big companies?
Take Microsoft, a company that did not exist 30 years ago. Just 20 years ago it was worth almost nothing; today nearly $300 billion. Yet at Microsoft, there is no separation of ownership from control. The chairman, Bill Gates, owns 12.3 per cent, other directors another 5 per cent and employees in total more than a third. Microsoft has been made by a very few creative individuals and runs largely for their benefit. It is not on the stock exchange because Microsoft needed capital, but because this route makes Mr Gates and his chums wealthier. And, as Gates says, "take away our 20 most important people, and I tell you we would become an unimportant company".
Capital is becoming less important. Now much less capital is necessary to create a really valuable business. For the first time, individuals who start a business that becomes really valuable can typically retain a significant chunk of ownership. Microsoft's original external capital need was less than $100,000, well below the level at which stock markets become relevant.
In 1986 Microsoft went public, raising a wholly unnecessary $44m. Last time that I looked, the company was worth $286bn. When you get a return of 6,800 times the 1986 capital, or more than three million times the original capital, you know that capital is not the decisive factor. Individualism is replacing capitalism. "The emperor of the future," said Winston Churchill, "will be the emperor of ideas."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments