Richard Garner: Why Government's approach to difficulties is flawed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The shortcomings of the education service were graphically underlined by two separate events in the past 24 hours. First, the widely respected former schools inspector Sir Mike Tomlinson yesterday delivered a scathing attack on A-levels - claiming that they were "killing scholarship" in virtually every subject studied in the sixth-form. Then today the National Audit Office reveals there are still more than a million children taught in poorly performing schools.
Both events point to the urgency with which the Government must tackle the underlying problems of the service. To their credit, ministers have published White Papers to tackle both the issues raised. The trouble is they have produced a mixed bag.
The White Paper on exam reform does talk about making A-levels more difficult - with optional harder questions to be piloted next year - and the introduction of extended essay projects to develop the thinking skills of all candidates.
The trouble is it refuses to endorse the main recommendation of Sir Mike's inquiry into exam reform - that the existing GCSE and A-level system be scrapped in favour of an overarching diploma covering both academic and vocational qualifications.
That would be the spur that would motivate school drop-outs at 16 into staying on and studying something worthwhile.
On poorly performing schools, there is a lot in the controversial White Paper on education, published by the Education Secretary Ruth Kelly last autumn, that would address the problems. Specifically, it would cut the time a school has to show improvements after failing an inspection to just one year. At that stage, if no improvements were evident, it would be considered for closure - or come under the wing of an existing successful school or become an academy.
The trouble is this modest and uncontroversial reform is in danger of being lost because of the furore over the whole package - with Labour backbenchers claiming giving schools more control over admissions will lead to more selection.
The Government is in its present mess because it has fudged both issues. It says it acknowledges the case for boosting vocational education - but by introducing specialist vocational diplomas it will ensure the academic/ vocational divide continues. Its attempt to portray its White Paper reforms as giving more autonomy to schools and more choice for parents at the same time are contradictory.
Tony Blair fond of saying that New Labour is best when it is at its boldest. There is no evidence of boldness in these two White Papers.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments