Rhiannon Harries: What is sexy? Well it isn't kitchen appliances, cars or 'that' word

Saturday 15 May 2010 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Victoria's Secret, the American purveyor of scanty lingerie and male fantasies, has just put out a video on the net purporting to answer that question of our time: "What is sexy?" I know, a worry, isn't it? The terminally unimaginative need not fear, however: Brit model Rosie Huntington-Whiteley and a couple of her fellow brand ambassadors are on hand to explain.

With all the charisma you might expect of a table leg, Rosie informs us that, this year, it's all about "bumshells". Don't worry, before you disappear into a spiral of insecurity-fuelled Googling as I did, that's actually "bombshells" in a west London-meets-NY drawl.

We then get a disparate list of body parts and personality traits belonging to female celebs that are judged to be superlatively sexy by persons unknown at Victoria's Secret. Cutie-pie country singer Taylor Swift bizarrely gets "sexiest hair" for her twee perm-a-like (if Kanye wants to tell her Beyoncé deserved it more, I'm with him on this one), while Ellen DeGeneres gets a condescending little pat for "sexiest sense of humour".

In two minutes 20 seconds, the word "sexy" or "sexiest" is repeated 22 times – so impoverished is the vocab, in fact, that people are included in the "sexiest" list, because they are "sexy". In fairness, it's hard to avoid the term under these circumstances, particularly given how regularly it now crops up. Cars are sexy, kitchen appliances are sexy. Even the odd sofa is considered deserving of the epithet.

At the root of it is the dubious modern coincidence between sex and consumer culture, but that's another can of worms; my problem is simply with the word itself. In the same way that ubiquitous adjectives such as "cool" and "edgy" limply fail to embody the quality to which they are supposed to refer, to describe something as "sexy" nowadays evokes not even a hint of seduction or sensuousness.

It was a combination of factors that really did for the word in my book. Paris Hilton, on whose tongue the English language goes to die, crystallised its inanity by making it one of her catchphrases. Then there were all those jowly male restaurant critics who began to take a far-too palpable pleasure in lustily describing a plate of offal as such. Cringe.

I think, however, what finally did for it was witnessing a major political scandal unfold around a "sexed-up" dossier and hearing everyone from Blair to Paxman comment, in all seriousness, upon just how "sexy" it really was. Perhaps the Victoria's Secret gals, experts as they are, ought to be the ones to judge?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in